By Short answer: The Monday shampoo lawsuit is a proposed class action, Garcia v. Zuru LLC, filed in federal court in California on July 25, 2025. It claims Monday Haircare sells shampoo in oversized, opaque bottles that look fuller than they are, a practice called slack-fill. It is not a hair loss, ingredient, or safety case. As of October 7, 2026, I found no settlement, no class certification, and no claim form. Native shampoo and conditioner is a different brand and has no filed class action that I could find.
Monday Shampoo Lawsuit at a Glance
| Question | Answer as of October 7, 2026 |
|---|---|
| What is the case called? | Garcia v. Zuru LLC, No. 5:25-cv-01908 |
| Which court? | U.S. District Court, Central District of California |
| Who is the defendant? | Zuru LLC, doing business as Monday Haircare |
| What is alleged? | Slack-fill: oversized, opaque bottles with a lot of empty space |
| Which product is named? | Monday Moisture + Hyaluronic Acid Shampoo, 12 fluid ounces |
| Is there a settlement or claim form? | No, none found |
| Is there a Native shampoo class action? | None found. A PFAS investigation was closed without a lawsuit |
People search for the Monday shampoo lawsuit for several reasons. Some saw a social media post about “half empty” bottles. Some heard that a shampoo caused hair loss and assume Monday is involved. Others typed Native or another brand by mistake. This guide separates the one case that exists from the rumors around it, explains the law in plain terms, and tells you what to do now. Attorneys Magazine will update it when the court docket changes.
What Is the Monday Shampoo Lawsuit About?
The Monday shampoo lawsuit accuses the maker of a popular drugstore hair care line of selling less product than the packaging suggests. Plaintiff Silvia Garcia says she bought Monday Moisture + Hyaluronic Acid Shampoo at a Target store in May 2025 and found a significant amount of empty space in the container. She says she would not have bought it, or would not have paid a premium price, had she known, according to Top Class Actions.
The complaint calls the practice a “slack-fill scam.” It says the 12-fluid-ounce shampoo sits in an opaque container, so shoppers cannot see how full the bottle is. It adds that even a shopper who reads the net weight on the label would not expect the bottle to hold far less than its size implies.
This is a packaging and pricing case. The complaint does not allege that Monday shampoo harms hair, irritates skin, or contains a banned ingredient. If you came looking for a hair loss lawsuit, jump to the section on that rumor below.
Monday Shampoo Lawsuit Update: Where the Case Stands in October 2026
The case is a proposed class action, which means no court has agreed that it can proceed on behalf of a group. A complaint is an allegation, not a finding of liability. The table shows what is publicly known.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| May 2025 | Plaintiff says she bought the shampoo at Target |
| July 25, 2025 | Complaint filed in the Central District of California |
| September 17, 2025 | Top Class Actions reports the filing |
| October 7, 2026 | No public report of a ruling, class certification, settlement, or claim form found |
I did not find a public statement from Monday or Zuru responding to the complaint. Slack-fill cases often end with the defendant filing a motion to dismiss, and many are dismissed or resolved before any class is certified. That is background, not a prediction about this case. The docket is the only reliable place to confirm what has happened since the last news report.
To check it yourself, search for case number 5:25-cv-01908 on PACER or in the Central District of California records. Reports on aggregator sites can lag the docket by weeks.
Monday Haircare Lawsuit: Who Sued, Who Is Being Sued, and Why
| Detail | What the complaint says |
|---|---|
| Plaintiff | Silvia Garcia |
| Defendant | Zuru LLC, doing business as Monday Haircare |
| Plaintiff’s lawyers | Scott J. Ferrell and Victoria C. Knowles of Pacific Trial Attorneys APC |
| Proposed class | Consumers who bought Monday Haircare’s underfilled products in the past four years |
| Legal claims | California Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and Consumers Legal Remedies Act |
| Relief sought | Class certification, damages, restitution, disgorgement, and an order stopping sales of underfilled products |
The details come from the Top Class Actions report on the filing. The plaintiff also argues that California courts have found similar slack-fill claims to have merit and to suit class treatment. Whether this court agrees is undecided.
Who Is Behind Monday Haircare?
Monday Haircare is a mass-market shampoo and conditioner line sold at big retailers such as Target and Sam’s Club. The company named in the complaint is Zuru LLC, which does business as Monday Haircare. Zuru is better known for toys, so many shoppers do not connect the two names. If you search the docket, look for Zuru, not only Monday.
Plaintiffs in packaging cases often pick everyday products with low prices, because the same bottle reaches a very large number of buyers. The harm in each purchase is small, which is why these claims are brought as class actions instead of single lawsuits. A few dollars lost on one bottle is not worth a lawsuit alone, but across millions of bottles the total can be large.
What Is Slack-Fill and Why Does It Matter for Monday Shampoo?
Slack-fill is the empty space between a product and the walls of its container. A little is normal. A lot, without a good reason, is what lawsuits challenge. The idea is simple: a shopper compares two bottles on a shelf, picks the one that looks bigger, and may pay more for it.
What California law says
California’s Fair Packaging and Labeling Act bars containers that are made, formed, or filled in a misleading way. It also says a container that does not let the consumer fully view its contents is misleading if it contains nonfunctional slack-fill. The text of Business and Professions Code section 12606 sets that rule and lists reasons that can excuse empty space, such as protecting the contents or the needs of the filling machines.
The key word is nonfunctional. Slack-fill alone is not enough. A plaintiff has to show the empty space serves no legitimate purpose, which is why these cases turn on packaging details and expert evidence.
How companies usually respond
Defendants in slack-fill cases commonly argue that the label states the net contents clearly, so no reasonable shopper is misled. Courts have accepted that argument in some food packaging cases and dismissed them. Defendants also point to functional reasons for the bottle design, such as shipping protection or filling equipment. The plaintiff here answers in advance that checking the net weight does not tell a shopper how much empty space to expect.
| Issue | What the plaintiff argues | What a defendant may argue |
|---|---|---|
| Bottle appearance | The opaque bottle hides how little shampoo it holds | The label states the net contents clearly |
| Empty space | The space serves no purpose and is nonfunctional | The space has functional reasons |
| Harm | Shoppers paid more than they would have | Shoppers got the volume printed on the label |
| Class treatment | Many buyers saw the same packaging | Buyers differ in what they saw and expected |
| Related Readings in Attorneys Magazine Poppi Lawsuit 2026: A false advertising class action that ended in an $8.9 million settlement, and how its claim process worked. Celsius Energy Drink Lawsuit: A $7.8 million class action settlement over product label claims. Chime Lawsuit 2026: A case where no settlement and no claim form exist yet, and what that means for you. |
Monday Shampoo and Conditioner Lawsuit: Which Products Are Named?
The one product the complaint describes in detail is Monday Moisture + Hyaluronic Acid Shampoo in the 12-fluid-ounce size. Top Class Actions reports that the plaintiff seeks to represent buyers of Monday Haircare’s underfilled products more broadly, and that the “slack-fill scam” extends to that shampoo in opaque containers. The report does not list every shampoo and conditioner in the proposed class.
That matters if you are searching for a Monday shampoo and conditioner lawsuit. A class definition is set by the court and can be narrowed, widened, or rewritten as the case moves. Until a court certifies a class, nobody can say which Monday products are in or out. If your bottle is a different Monday size or formula, do not assume you are covered or excluded.
Native Shampoo and Conditioner Lawsuit: Is It the Same Case?
No. Native is a separate brand owned by Procter & Gamble, and it is not a defendant in the Monday case. Searches for a Native shampoo and conditioner lawsuit often come from social media videos that blend several stories together.
What I found is an investigation, not a lawsuit. Attorneys working with ClassAction.org looked into whether some Native personal care products contain PFAS, sometimes called forever chemicals, despite marketing built on “naturally derived” and “simple” ingredients. The ClassAction.org page is now marked as complete, with a last update on February 4, 2026, and it says its information was posted when the investigation began and is for reference only. You can read the ClassAction.org Native page yourself.
I found no filed class action over Native shampoo or conditioner. Pages that describe a certified class, a Native settlement, or payout estimates are not backed by a case I could verify. If you have a specific reaction to a Native product, a doctor and a licensed attorney are better guides than a viral video.
| Brand | Verified legal action | Claim form or payout |
|---|---|---|
| Monday Haircare | Garcia v. Zuru LLC, a slack-fill class action filed July 25, 2025 | None found |
| Native (Procter & Gamble) | No filed shampoo class action found. A PFAS investigation was marked complete | None |
| Other shampoo brands | Separate cases exist, such as DMDM hydantoin hair loss suits against other brands | Check each case on its own |
Is There a Monday Shampoo Hair Loss Lawsuit?
I found no court filing that accuses Monday shampoo of causing hair loss. Some web pages say Monday faces a suit over a formaldehyde-releasing preservative called DMDM hydantoin. I found no complaint, docket, or court-based news report to support that, and the one verified Monday case is about packaging.
The confusion probably comes from other brands. Lawsuits over DMDM hydantoin and hair loss have been filed against hair care makers such as OGX and TRESemmé, and ClassAction.org keeps a page on DMDM hydantoin shampoo lawsuits. Those cases involve different companies, products, and courts, and outcomes have varied. A claim against one brand says nothing about another.
If you lose hair or have a scalp reaction after using any product, stop using it and see a dermatologist. Hair loss can come from stress, hormones, nutrition, medication, genetics, and many other causes, and a doctor can sort them out.
Can You Join the Monday Haircare Class Action?
Not right now, and not through a form. In a U.S. class action, you usually do not sign up. The named plaintiff sues for a group, and members of a certified class receive notice later. If a settlement follows, a claim process opens and you file by a deadline. Nothing like that exists for Monday today.
If a class is certified, membership will depend on the court’s definition. Based on the complaint, the proposed group is people who bought Monday Haircare’s underfilled products in the past four years. That is the plaintiff’s proposal, not an order. Keep any proof that you bought Monday products, including receipts, loyalty program records, online order history, and photos of the bottles.
Websites that tell you to “join the Monday shampoo lawsuit” or “add me” are usually lead generation pages or comment threads. Posting a comment on a news article does not add you to any case.
Is There a Monday Shampoo Lawsuit Settlement or Payout?
No. I found no settlement agreement, no court approval, no settlement website, and no payout amount. Anything you read about a Monday shampoo settlement amount is speculation.
When consumer class actions do settle, the process follows set steps. The table shows each one and where the Monday case stands.
| Stage | What happens | Monday case |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Settlement agreement | The parties agree on terms and a fund | Not found |
| 2. Preliminary approval | A judge allows notice to go out | Not found |
| 3. Class notice | Email, mail, and a website announce the deal | Not found |
| 4. Claim period | Members file claims by a deadline | Not open |
| 5. Final approval | The judge decides whether the deal is fair | Not found |
| 6. Payments | The administrator pays valid claims | Not found |
In slack-fill settlements, individual payments tend to be modest because many buyers share one fund and each purchase is small. A settlement can also include product changes, such as a fill line or clearer labeling, instead of or alongside cash.
What to Do If You Bought Monday Shampoo or Conditioner
- Keep your proof of purchase. Save receipts, order emails, and retailer account history. Photograph the bottles and the net contents statement on the label.
- Do not pay anyone to file a claim. A real class action claim is free. A request for a fee is a scam.
- Check the net contents. Compare the fluid ounces on the front of the label with similar products. This is your best defense against slack-fill, whatever happens in court.
- Follow the docket. Look up case number 5:25-cv-01908 for rulings, or follow trusted legal news sources.
- Talk to a licensed attorney if you have specific losses or a medical reaction. Slack-fill claims are small. A skin or hair reaction is a different matter that a doctor and a lawyer should review.
- Report misleading packaging. You can contact the retailer, and consumer protection agencies take reports about deceptive packaging.
How to Spot a Fake Monday Lawsuit Claim Page
When a company is in the news, copycat sites appear fast. Use this table on any page that claims you can claim money from Monday.
| Check | Real settlement | Fake or speculative page |
|---|---|---|
| Case name and number | Matches the court docket | Missing, or only “Monday lawsuit” |
| Administrator | A named independent third party | None, or a generic claims center |
| Cost | Free to file | Fee, “processing charge,” or upgrade |
| Data requested | Contact details and maybe a payment preference | Social Security number or bank login |
| Payout | Set after claims are counted | Fixed dollar tiers promised in advance |
| Deadline | A court-set date in the notice | Countdown timers and pressure |
If you shared sensitive details on a suspicious site, change your passwords, monitor your accounts, and report it at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Monday Shampoo Lawsuit FAQ
Is there a Monday shampoo lawsuit?
Yes. A proposed class action, Garcia v. Zuru LLC, was filed on July 25, 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. It accuses Zuru LLC, which does business as Monday Haircare, of selling shampoo in oversized, opaque bottles with a lot of empty space. The allegations are unproven.
What is the Monday Haircare lawsuit about?
It is a slack-fill case. The plaintiff says Monday Moisture + Hyaluronic Acid Shampoo comes in a 12-fluid-ounce bottle that looks fuller than it is. The complaint is about packaging and price, not about ingredients, safety, or hair loss.
Is there a Monday shampoo lawsuit update?
As of October 7, 2026, I found no public report of a settlement, class certification, or claim form in the case. Court dockets can change daily, so check PACER or the Central District of California docket for case 5:25-cv-01908 before relying on any status.
Is there a Monday shampoo and conditioner lawsuit?
The complaint names Monday Haircare products sold in underfilled packaging and gives the shampoo as its main example. Top Class Actions reports that the plaintiff seeks to represent buyers of Monday Haircare’s underfilled products. Check the docket for the exact product list.
Is there a Native shampoo and conditioner lawsuit?
I found no filed class action over Native shampoo or conditioner. Attorneys working with ClassAction.org investigated whether some Native products contain PFAS despite “clean” marketing, and that investigation is marked complete. An investigation is not a lawsuit.
Can I join the Monday shampoo class action?
Not through a form today. You do not usually sign up for a class action. If the court certifies a class or approves a settlement, eligible buyers receive notice and a claim process opens. Save your receipts and watch official sources.
How much could I get from a Monday shampoo settlement?
Nobody can say, because no settlement exists. Payments in slack-fill settlements depend on the fund size, the number of valid claims, and legal fees. Treat any dollar figure on a website as a guess.
Does Monday shampoo cause hair loss?
No court has made that finding, and I found no lawsuit against Monday that alleges it. Hair loss has many causes. If you have scalp irritation or shedding, see a dermatologist.
Bottom Line on the Monday Shampoo Lawsuit
The Monday shampoo lawsuit is a real but unresolved slack-fill case about oversized, opaque bottles. It has no settlement, no claim form, and no payout that I could find as of October 7, 2026. It is not a hair loss case, and it is not about Native. Keep your receipts, ignore anyone who asks for money, and check the docket for case 5:25-cv-01908 for real updates. Attorneys Magazine will update this page when the court record changes.
Last updated on: October 8, 2026